Cost Audit › Penalties

Cost Audit Penalties: What Non-Compliance Actually Costs

Missed CRA-2 filings, late CRA-4 submissions, or skipped cost records don't just risk a notice — they carry real, escalating costs under the Companies Act. Here is what's actually at stake.

Compliance Risk Review
Exposure assessed
Sections 148 & 450 reviewed

Overview

What Penalties Apply for Cost Audit Non-Compliance?

Non-compliance with cost record maintenance, cost auditor appointment, or CRA filing obligations under Section 148 of the Companies Act can expose both the company and its officers to penalty, read together with the general penalty provision under Section 450. Separately, late filing of Form CRA-4 attracts its own additional fee that increases with the length of delay and carries no upper cap — making genuinely late filings far costlier than an on-time one, however small the original oversight.

Who Needs This

Who Should Review Their Penalty Exposure

Companies with a missed CRA filing
Companies unsure of applicability
Directors and company secretaries
Foreign companies with India filings

Where the Cost Comes From

The Two Sources of Cost Audit Penalty Risk

Section 148 read with Section 450

General penalty provision covering the company and every officer in default

Company + Officers both exposed
Applies to failures in records maintenance, auditor appointment, or reporting
CRA-4 Late Filing Fee

A daily additional fee applied for delayed filing of the cost audit report

₹100/day no upper cap
Accrues automatically the longer the filing is delayed
Officer-level liability is real, not theoretical

Penalty provisions under the Companies Act apply to "officers in default" individually, not just the company as an entity — which typically includes the CFO, company secretary and relevant board members depending on their role in the lapse.

Why It Matters

Why a Penalty Risk Review Is Worth Doing

Catch gaps before they compound

A missed CRA-2 this year can cascade into CRA-3/CRA-4 issues next year.

Stop the daily fee clock

Every day of CRA-4 delay adds to an uncapped fee — early action limits the damage.

Protect individual officers

Directors and CS staff get clarity on their personal exposure, not just the company's.

Documented remediation plan

A clear path to compliance is easier to present to the board than silence.

Root-cause identification

We identify why a lapse happened, not just patch the immediate filing gap.

Prevent repeat lapses

Process fixes reduce the chance of the same gap recurring next year.

How It Works

Our Process for a Penalty Risk Review

A calm, structured path from identifying exposure to closing it out.

Start My Risk Review
Compliance history review

We check your filing history for CRA-2, CRA-3 and CRA-4 across recent years.

2
Exposure assessment

Any gaps are assessed against Section 148 and Section 450 penalty provisions.

3
Remediation plan

A prioritized plan addresses the most time-sensitive exposure first.

4
Filing catch-up

Outstanding filings are prepared and submitted as quickly as compliant.

5
Process fix going forward

We help build internal checkpoints to prevent recurrence.

Before You Start

Documents We Review for a Penalty Assessment

Prior CRA-2/CRA-3/CRA-4 filings
Financial statements, last 2–3 years
Board resolutions on auditor appointment
Any MCA correspondence or notices received

Sector Coverage

Industries We Serve

Electronics
Pharmaceutical
Chemicals
Engineering
Auto Components
Semiconductor
Manufacturing
Foreign Companies

Why SSCOIndia

Why Choose SSCOIndia for a Penalty Risk Review

ICMAI Cost Accountants
Written compliance position
Fast, no-obligation review
PAN India, foreign entities too

Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Section 148 of the Companies Act, 2013, read together with the general penalty provision under Section 450, governs penalties for non-compliance with cost record, cost audit and CRA filing requirements.

Both. Penalty provisions apply to the company as well as to "officers in default," which can include the CFO, company secretary and relevant board members.

Late CRA-4 filing attracts an additional fee that accrues per day of delay, with no upper cap, separate from any penalty under Sections 148 and 450.

Yes, failure to maintain cost records where Rule 5 applies is treated as non-compliance with Section 148 and can attract penalty in the same way as a missed audit.

Lack of awareness does not remove liability — applicability is based on objective sector and turnover tests, which is why an early applicability review is valuable.

Any reduction or waiver would depend on the specific facts and applicable adjudication process; it isn't automatic, so early voluntary compliance is the more reliable path.

It can raise questions about the appointment's procedural validity for that year, in addition to the direct filing penalty exposure.

As soon as possible — daily fees for CRA-4 delays continue to accrue, so remediation timing directly affects the eventual cost.

Voluntary, prompt remediation is generally viewed more favourably than a lapse discovered later through inspection, though it does not eliminate the applicable fees.

Yes, we review your filing history, assess exposure, and manage catch-up filings alongside a plan to prevent recurrence.

Need Help With Cost Audit Penalties?

Book a free consultation and get a clear compliance position before you commit to anything.

Call Book Free Consultation